24 Sept 1982
YAM KAR ON v. YU KWOK KEUNG
- Citation
- YAM KAR ON v. YU KWOK KEUNG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV80/1982
A subsequent late payment after a written warning can constitute continuance of unnecessary inconvenience when assessed in light of the tenant's prior persistent defaults; therefore a single default following warning can satisfy the proviso to s.53(2)(d) and justify an order for possession.