6 Apr 2022
黎乐忠 對 入境事務處處長
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 483
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV457/2020
The applicant's entries were consistently on visitor permissions which lapsed on departure under s11(10) of the Immigration Ordinance; therefore he did not have lawful continuous ordinary residence for seven years required by Basic Law Art 24(2) and Schedule 1 para 2(b). The judicial review was premature because statutory remedies remained available; the appeal therefore failed.