18 Aug 2008
HO-HSUCH-MIN GISELE WAI YING AND ANOTHER v. HO CHING FAI
- Citation
- HO-HSUCH-MIN GISELE WAI YING AND ANOTHER v. HO CHING FAI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1805/2007
Because the defendant did not pay the further deposit by the contractual deadline and produced no evidence that the plaintiffs accepted late payment, the renewal option under Clause 10 was not validly exercised; the tenancy therefore expired on 22 August 2007 and the defendant raised no arguable defence to the plaintiffs' claim, so the appeal fails and summary judgment is upheld.