29 Aug 2025
LI LI HONG v. CHEN DI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 3885
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2091/2024
Summary judgment was refused because defendants raised triable issues (notably arguable common/unilateral mistake and potential discharge of surety by plaintiff's conduct) making Order 14 inappropriate; continuation and post-judgment Mareva relief were set aside because plaintiff failed to demonstrate the requisite objective real risk of unjustified dissipation and the ex parte procedure lacked adequate justification and full and frank disclosure; D1's contention he was not a party to the Guarantee was rejected on the documentary evidence showing he signed as guarantor.