20 Aug 2014
MESSRS BAKER & MCKENZIE v. HENNEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS
- Citation
- MESSRS BAKER & MCKENZIE v. HENNEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCMP809/2014
The court construed the Superseding Orders by their express terms and plans, holding items 2-4 and the necessary attendant expenses of scaffolding and insurance (items 1 and 7) were reasonably necessary to comply. The disputed works (items 5 and 6) were not within the scope of the Superseding Orders; the Buildings Department letter did not corroborate the alleged oral representation. Therefore the 1st and 2nd claimants were liable for items 1-4 and 7 totaling HK$100,000; prior releases and payments were accounted for and the remaining funds ordered distributed accordingly; costs were awarded…