14 Oct 2016
JESSOP & BAIRD (HONG KONG) LTD v. NEO HWEE KHIM AND OTHERS
- Citation
- JESSOP & BAIRD (HONG KONG) LTD v. NEO HWEE KHIM AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2572/2016
The mandatory injunction was continued because the plaintiff provided persuasive evidence that the contested property belonged to it and was held at D5, D3 demonstrated control over D5 by his communications and conduct, and damages were inadequate given the risk to orders and goodwill; therefore the high standard for granting an interim mandatory injunction was met.