11 Nov 1999
The judge found the plaintiff's drawings to be original and likely copied by the defendant, concluded there was a serious question to be tried and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and therefore continued the interim injunction until trial or further order.
25 Jan 1996
The interlocutory injunction was refused because the Plaintiff failed to show an arguable case that the Defendant's machine reproduced a substantial part of the Plaintiff's drawings; measured features, proportions and construction differed sufficiently to negate a finding of reproduction at this stage.
22 Jan 1981
There was a serious issue to be tried on design and copyright, but on a balance of convenience the interim injunction was refused because the market was highly competitive, the defendant would suffer disproportionate loss from restraint, and the defendant's undertaking to preserve records made it possible to quantify damages if plaintiff succeeded.