20 Apr 2018
吳大国 對 万洲国际有限公司
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 409
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5830/2016
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because, although filed within the applicable 28‑day period, the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospect of success: the late affidavits did not alter the conclusion that similarity of company names alone cannot impose liability on the defendant and service to the plaintiff's nominated address was effective; therefore leave was refused.