24 Aug 2020
OE1 AND ANOTHER v. SC
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2065
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT66/2019
The court held that Article 33(1)(a) did not permit correction of non‑clerical substantive omissions but the tribunal was entitled under Article 33(3) to issue an additional award because OE's claims for a perpetual royalty‑free licence and injunctive relief were claims presented in the arbitration but omitted from the dispositive part; accordingly the Addendum was valid, the setting aside application failed, enforcement of the Award as amended was granted, and additional grounds raised later were waived and dismissed.