29 Aug 2022
張聘心 對 黃志恒
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 1258
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV65/2020
The appeal is dismissed because the respondent failed to discharge the evidential burden to prove he was the beneficial owner; the trial judge's adverse credibility findings and factual conclusions were supported by the evidence and were not shown to be plainly wrong; the costs order under the Legal Aid Ordinance s17(3) was justified by the respondent's improper conduct and untruthful case.