11 Jun 2020
H v. W
- Citation
- [2020] HKFC 123
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC8332/2017
The wife’s application for litigation funding was dismissed because she had deployable assets and had transferred substantial funds offshore during the divorce process (demonstrating availability of resources), so she did not satisfy the Currey criteria; the husband’s variation application was dismissed because his asserted loss of means and inability to borrow were not supported by adequate evidence and the court concluded he retained resources or access to borrowing and therefore could continue to meet the MPS Order; accordingly the original MPS Order stands.