30 Sept 2011
LUU HUNG VIET DERRICK also known as HUNG VIET DERRICK LUU v. CAR CITY MOTORS LTD
- Citation
- LUU HUNG VIET DERRICK also known as HUNG VIET DERRICK LUU v. CAR CITY MOTORS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2421/2009
On the balance of probabilities there was no consensus ad idem or sufficient agreement on essential terms (no binding acceptance or signed final contract and no agreed forfeiture term communicated), therefore no contract existed and the defendant must return the HK$1,000,000 deposit (relying on World Food Fair authority).