19 Jun 2006
IP KAM FAT v. CHO KIN TAK
- Citation
- IP KAM FAT v. CHO KIN TAK
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ14306/2000
The defence of conditional delivery fails because the evidence attempting to qualify the written unconditional cheques was inadmissible and, on the merits, there was no common intention that operation of the Defendant's cheques be subject to the alleged conditions; the sums were advances to the Defendant personally and the Plaintiff is entitled to enforce the cheque.