21 Oct 2020
游鳳珠 對 盧偉旗牧師及另一人
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2554
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA925/2018
The summons was set aside because the plaintiff had no proper basis: the proposed third defendant had not been validly joined without the court's leave; the allegations against that person lacked particulars and a disclosed cause of action; the extraordinary remedies sought (apology, compensation, seizure/closure of property) were not shown to be within the court's power on the material before the court; contested factual issues must be resolved at trial with evidence rather than by the court on the summons.