21 May 1992
THE QUEEN v. IP TAT MAN AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. IP TAT MAN AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC503/1990
Any imperfections in the trial judge's directions were harmless in context; the statutory presumptions were correctly confined to possession-for-trafficking counts, the whispered remark—though regrettably repeated—did not create a lurking doubt sufficient to overturn convictions, the sergeant's later misconduct did not render his evidence so unreliable as to undermine the jury's verdicts given the corroborating evidence, and the convictions were therefore safe and were affirmed.