31 May 2019
TIGER RESORT ASIA LTD v. KAZUO OKADA AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1415
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA3017/2017
The court found a serious issue to be tried and a clear link for tracing from the HK$130m to the 3rd Sum and part of the 4th Sum, D1 had failed to comply adequately with the disclosure order, and the balance of convenience favored interlocutory proprietary relief; accordingly the court granted a proprietary preservation injunction over the 3rd Sum and HK$22,556,519.38 of the 4th Sum, ordered ancillary discovery in aid and confined cross-examination of D1 to paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 of his 2nd affirmation.