1 May 1997
KEN HA KHANH PHONG v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF HONG KONG
- Citation
- KEN HA KHANH PHONG v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF HONG KONG
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV246/1996
The magistrate acted within his discretion in refusing the adjournment because the applicant could not demonstrate that the interview notes or proposed cross-examination would destroy the witness's evidence; the transcript reviewed by the judge and this Court showed no material inconsistency that would alter the committal result, so the committal order was valid and the appeal was dismissed.