Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law LAM SEE CHUNG, STEVEN

LAM SEE CHUNG, STEVEN

The Court of First Instance dismissed four magistracy sentence appeals, holding that the magistrate had properly applied totality and relevant sentencing principles.

  • Totality principle
  • Concurrent and consecutive sentences
  • Guilty plea discount
  • Reference to higher court under magistrates ordinance s118(d)
  • Assessment of starting point for aggregate sentence
  • Totality-principle
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. ONG SIU SIN, KEVIN

HKSAR v. ONG SIU SIN, KEVIN

The court dismissed a magistracy conviction appeal and related sentence appeals, holding that worthless cheques and promises to repay could support legally enforceable liabilities under s18B.

  • Deception
  • Legally enforceable liability
  • Dishonesty
  • Admissibility of documentary evidence
  • Amendment of charges
  • Delay and disclosure
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. YE FUREN

HKSAR v. YE FUREN

Sentence appeal dismissed where the appellant actually used a forged identity card to open a bank account and later present it again, justifying a custodial term.

  • Forgery
  • Use of forged identity card
  • Obtaining services by deception
  • Sentence appeal
  • Sentencing
  • Identity-documents
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. GALLARDO EMELITA JAIME

HKSAR v. GALLARDO EMELITA JAIME

The High Court allowed a sentence appeal, quashed a 4-month imprisonment term for obtaining property by deception, and substituted an absolute discharge.

  • Obtaining property by deception
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Absolute discharge
  • Guilty plea credit
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Absolute-discharge
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. LI WAI HUNG

HKSAR v. LI WAI HUNG

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against a 45-month sentence for 31 counts of obtaining property by deception, holding the 25% s.27 uplift was justified.

  • Obtaining property by deception
  • Street deception
  • Sentence enhancement under s.27
  • Plea discount
  • Totality principle
  • Deterrence
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. HO KA KEUNG

HKSAR v. HO KA KEUNG

The Court of Appeal upheld Ho Ka-keung’s fraud conviction under s.16A, holding the evidence supported deceit by wilful blindness or recklessness, though sentence leave remained pending.

  • Deception
  • Dishonesty
  • Recklessness
  • Wilful blindness
  • Trial management
  • Reasons for verdict
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. CHAN HON MING

HKSAR v. CHAN HON MING

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for leave to appeal against conviction, holding that flight evidence was admissible and the judge’s directions were adequate.

  • Flight evidence
  • Jury directions
  • Deception
  • False accounting
  • Letters of credit
  • Safety of conviction
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. LEUNG WAI YIP

HKSAR v. LEUNG WAI YIP

The Court of Appeal held that diverting a company debt into a new company’s account could amount to theft of a chose in action. Leave was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.

  • Appropriation
  • Chose in action
  • Deception
  • Dishonesty (ghosh test)
  • Intention to permanently deprive
  • Companies registry/share allotment
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. CHAN KING WAN

HKSAR v. CHAN KING WAN

The High Court dismissed the conviction appeal in a magistracy appeal over a false instrument and deception charge, but allowed the sentence appeal and substituted 200 hours of community service.

  • Use of false instrument
  • Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception
  • Credibility assessment
  • Community service orders
  • Sentencing principles
  • False-instrument
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. LI KWOK MING

HKSAR v. LI KWOK MING

The Court of Appeal dismissed leave to appeal against a conviction under s 18D of the Theft Ordinance, holding that judicial interventions did not cause unfairness and no improper judicial notice was taken.

  • Deception
  • Letter of credit transactions
  • Bank fraud
  • Judicial intervention in trial
  • Judicial notice
  • Credibility and fact finding
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.