20 May 2026
Refusal to extend time because the applicant was more than four months late, offered insufficient reasons for the delay, had no realistic prospect of success on the intended appeal against the Board's unsubstantiated non-refoulement finding, and therefore extension was refused and the application dismissed.
21 Jan 2026
Extension of time refused and application dismissed because the applicant provided no valid reason for the one-day delay and the intended appeal had no realistic prospect of success given the Board's finding that the non-refoulement claim was unsubstantiated.
19 Dec 2024
Extension of time refused because applicant was approximately five months late, provided no explanation for the delay, and the intended appeal had no realistic prospect of success given the Board's conclusion that the alleged facts did not meet the legal/Convention threshold; applying the statutory rules and authority on extension factors, the Court dismissed the application.