27 Jun 2017
HKSAR v. HO WAI KI, EDITH
- Citation
- HKSAR v. HO WAI KI, EDITH
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA248/2017
The expert evidence, admissible under s65B and unchallenged as to expertise, taken together with the appellant's admission describing the bag as a "high imitation", the circumstances of sale, and the significant price disparity to genuine retail supporting the expert's finding on poor workmanship and inferior materials, satisfied the prosecution's burden beyond reasonable doubt that the handbag bore a forged Chanel trademark; the Magistrate's comments did not render the evaluation of evidence inappropriate and the conviction was upheld.