30 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the judge's refusal to grant leave and raised no viable ground; the Court will not substitute its view for the Board's factual assessments absent legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality.
29 May 2024
Extension of time refused because the intended appeal lacked merit and a realistic prospect of success: the Board's adverse credibility findings were within its factual remit and not shown to be vitiated by public law error, so granting an extension would be futile despite the delay being largely technical.
8 Dec 2022
Refusal to extend time and refusal of leave were justified: applicant was inordinate and unjustifiably delayed (over ten months) with no corroboration of change of address; he failed to identify any arguable legal error, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Director’s or Board’s decisions; prior findings that state protection and internal relocation were available undermined any realistic prospect of success; fresh evidence was new but not shown to meet criteria for admission or to alter the outcome; therefore no prospect of success and extension refused.