29 Dec 2005
TATIANA CHINKO v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
- Citation
- TATIANA CHINKO v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL45/2005
Because the applicant lacked a viable sponsor at the relevant times (including on 23 June 2003 and December 2003), she could not meet the prerequisite for unconditional stay under the old policy; the June 2003 rejection was valid meaning the December decision related to a later application, the proposed late amendment was out of time, bound to fail and therefore refused, and the judicial review dismissed.