29 Nov 2006
TOP FLYING INVESTMENT CO v. OPEN MISSION ASSETS LTD
- Citation
- TOP FLYING INVESTMENT CO v. OPEN MISSION ASSETS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA566/2006
On the evidence the defendant was in contempt beyond reasonable doubt for failing to deliver the specified share certificates and the sole director, Mr Liu, was in contempt for not taking reasonable steps to secure compliance; service could be dispensed because the defendant's solicitors had notice; accordingly leave to issue a writ of sequestration was granted and costs ordered on an indemnity basis.