14 Feb 2003
AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. AQUA SPLASH LTD.
- Citation
- AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. AQUA SPLASH LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV175/2002
The court refused admission of the proposed fresh evidence because the plaintiffs failed to satisfy Ladd v Marshall (notably lack of reasonable diligence and concerns as to apparent credibility due to inducements and delay); the court corrected paragraph 2 of its earlier order under the slip rule to limit its effect "as against the Appellants"; and questions proffered for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal were not matters of general or public importance warranting leave (delivery up orders construed as time‑limited and s49-related complaints did not raise general public importance…