18 Jan 2005
POON MEE KUEN v. CHAN HOR TONG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- POON MEE KUEN v. CHAN HOR TONG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1431/2004
Vendors failed to satisfactorily answer requisitions because they only asserted partitions were non-structural without providing supporting evidence (eg architect/surveyor reports); purchaser had not waived requisitions because she was not shown to have been aware of legal consequences; Clause 22 did not shift risk of title defects; thus purchaser validly rescinded and is entitled to return of deposits, indemnities, damages, costs, interest and a purchaser's lien.