31 Aug 1983
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review or alter the Governor's formal designation of areas under s36(1)(c); Lot 182 is outside the duly designated Area 900 and the tenements therefore do not qualify for exemption under s36(1)(c) (and do not meet other s36(1) provisions), so the appeals must be dismissed.
31 Aug 1983
The Tribunal held that Area 900 was validly designated under s36(1)(c) and excluded Lot 182; the Tribunal has no judicial power to review or alter that designation; the 11 tenements are therefore outside the designated area and, having been built in 1982, do not satisfy the exemption criteria of s36(1)(c), so the appeals fail.
31 Aug 1983
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to revise or invalidate the Governor's designation; Lot 182 was outside Area 900 as designated; consequently the 11 tenements could not benefit from s36(1)(c) exemption and, being post‑1945, did not meet the alternative pre‑1945 criterion, so the appeals fail.
31 Aug 1983
The Tribunal held that Area 900 was duly designated by the Governor, Lot 182 is outside that designated area (approximately 75 feet), the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the boundary designation, and therefore the 11 tenements are not exempt under s36(1)(c); appeals dismissed.