11 Dec 2015
葉祥偉 對 差餉物業估價署署長
- Citation
- 葉祥偉 對 差餉物業估價署署長
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDRA26/2014
The Tribunal accepted the respondent's valuing officer as a proper expert whose evidence was admissible and reliable; the tree had been the subject of sufficiently probable removal such that its effect need not be reflected in valuation at the statutory date; the Tribunal correctly applied valuation principles including limits of direct comparison where aggregate adjustments were large; the appellant failed to show the expert's adjustments or comparables were unduly erroneous; fresh evidence and late arguments did not meet the Ladd v Marshall criteria; accordingly the Tribunal's 25 Sept 2015…