21 Feb 2023
KINGFIELD INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT LTD v. PAKCO PROPERTY SERVICES LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 571
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1536/2016
Leave to file and serve the two affirmations out of time was dismissed because Kingfield failed to provide an adequate and timely explanation for non-compliance with consent directions, did not apply promptly for extension when it became apparent it could not meet the deadline, and granting leave would cause unfair prejudice and delay to the respondents; costs awarded to respondents.