30 Oct 2002
AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. AQUA SPLASH LTD.
- Citation
- AQUA-LEISURE INDUSTRIES INC. AND ANOTHER v. AQUA SPLASH LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV175/2002
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the committal findings because the judge relied substantially on multiple hearsay without applying or referring to the mandatory weighing provisions of the amended Evidence Ordinance (ss 48–49), and there was insufficient admissible evidence to establish that the defendant had control or a presently enforceable right to possession of the Dongguan goods or the business card; those defects fatally undermined the contempt findings and fines.