12 Sept 2008
ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP840/2007
The defendants failed to demonstrate a material change of circumstances that removed the plaintiffs' entitlement under the Anton Piller Order; there is no evidence that discovery in the main action has subsumed the Anton Piller inspection entitlement; therefore the application to discharge the Anton Piller Order is without merit and is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.