8 Apr 2026
程祉諾 對 TRENDY FITNESS PARTY LTD
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 522
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ6423/2024
The court held that service by ordinary post to the registered office and other addresses was valid (none of the mail was returned and the defendant attended the hearing), the defendant had notice and opportunity to produce the material, the appeal period was extended as a discretionary matter, and there was no legal error or unreasonableness in the hearing officer's costs assessment; therefore the appeal was dismissed and costs awarded to the plaintiff.