15 May 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 楊卓羲
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 3749
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA432/2024
The magistrate lawfully and reasonably ordered disclosure of the two psychiatric reports to the prosecution under s45 of the Mental Health Ordinance to enable the prosecution to fulfil its public‑interest oversight role; confidentiality safeguards and absence of evidence of risk of improper disclosure meant the appellant's privacy objection did not justify withholding the reports, and the appellate court, on rehearing of the matter, upheld that conclusion.