21 May 2014
KJ v. KMLM
- Citation
- KJ v. KMLM
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMC4/2010
Order 22 sanctioned offer regime is inapplicable to applications touching matrimonial finance where court supervision/leave is required; indemnity costs were justified and ordered against Husband and Father because their pre- and intra-litigation conduct (concerted transfer of assets, obstructive and dishonest discovery and evidence) was venal and wicked and caused disproportionate costs; Father is jointly liable from commencement because he knowingly participated in transfers in contemplation of litigation; Husband granted realistic extension to pay lump sum by three instalments actually pai…