26 Jun 1998
TO KAN CHI AND OTHERS v. PUI MAN YAU AND OTHERS
- Citation
- TO KAN CHI AND OTHERS v. PUI MAN YAU AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV117/1998
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions identified were narrow, fact‑specific and not of the great general or public importance required by s.22(1)(b); the interlocutory order in issue did not fall within the class of appealable orders established by precedent; the government departments were not parties and the circumstances did not justify referral of broad policy questions to the Court of Final Appeal.