6 Jan 2009
KEEN LLOYD ENERGY LTD v. BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LTD
- Citation
- KEEN LLOYD ENERGY LTD v. BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LTD
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV37/2008
Leave to appeal was refused because no question of great general or public importance arose and no exceptional circumstances were shown; the trial judge did not err in refusing to admit the fresh letters as they were not demonstrably relevant to alter the striking‑out outcome, and the substantive claims were properly struck out because the bank could lawfully withdraw facilities, the statements were promissory rather than factual, no actionable loss was pleaded and the 2006 claim was time‑barred.