24 Oct 2018
SINGH HARDEV v. DOKE JITENDRA AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 1304
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2569/2016
Plaintiff's application to vary the costs order was dismissed because he accepted the trial judgment finding both parties dishonest and offered no basis to distinguish himself; the defendants' application for leave to appeal was dismissed because they advanced only bare assertions, produced no new admissible evidence and failed to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success under s63A(2) DCO.