19 Mar 2024
陳淑仁 對 賴俊光及另一人
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 251
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP254/2023
Extension refused because appellant failed to demonstrate any real prospect of success on appeal, failed to produce easily obtainable bank records despite directions (permitting adverse inference), offered no satisfactory explanation for the delay of approximately three months, and did not rebut the trial judge's credible factual findings; therefore discretionary extension of time was properly refused.