12 Feb 2015
香港特別行政區 訴 戴麟懿
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 戴麟懿
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC139/2014
The Court held there was ample, coherent and uncontested evidence to infer beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant knowingly possessed multiple false bank documents and intended they be used (or by others) to induce belief they were genuine for commercial/financing purposes (the required double intent under Cap.200 s75(1)); expert evidence was unnecessary for the disputed factual issue of whether documents were "samples"; chain of custody and provenance of the USB/files were adequately established; accordingly the leave to appeal against conviction was refused and convictions upheld.