24 Jul 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 陳章培
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2872
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA78/2023
Because the appellant did not dispute that the taximeter indicator was up and the roof 'TAXI' light was illuminated, statutory definitions and regulations establish the vehicle was 'standing or plying for hire' irrespective of claimed intent or a 'paused' sign, and the evidence as a whole proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt; the appeal is therefore dismissed.