11 Nov 1992
TREAD EAST LTD v. HILLIER DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Citation
- TREAD EAST LTD v. HILLIER DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA907/1991
Vendor failed to satisfactorily answer a substantive requisition that raised a real prospect the 12 Sept 1984 assignment could be set aside; although the due execution point was covered by s.23 and the Turquand rule and had been waived, the vendor's refusal to dispel the risk of set‑aside justified the purchaser terminating the contract and recovering the initial deposit and obtaining the declaration as to the stakeholder deposit.