23 Mar 2026
有關戴海强的事宜
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1761
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB6209/2025
The signed written repayment agreement fixed the indebtedness; contractual estoppel bars the debtor from denying the agreed state of affairs; the debtor's asserted defenses (different principal, prior repayments, duress, oral pre-condition) were unsupported or contradicted by contemporaneous WhatsApp records, payment records and the agreement; substituted service had been validly effected; the debtor expressly refused to repay at hearing and therefore met the s6A(1)(a) test for inability/unwillingness to pay — accordingly a bankruptcy order was properly made for the outstanding HKD432,000.