30 Aug 2019
MAULDEN INVESTMENT LTD v. MHYH LTD
- Citation
- [2019] HKLdT 50
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDPE998/2018
The Tribunal found clause 12 was validly triggered and the applicant lawfully terminated the tenancy; the respondent failed to prove any binding representations or promises that prevented termination and failed to establish reliance or estoppel; therefore the respondent is in breach and ordered to deliver vacant possession; liability for damages is acknowledged but quantum and disputed adjusted fees/rates are to be determined at a separate hearing; mesne profits and tentative management and air-conditioning charges awarded in the interim; costs follow the event in favour of the applicant.