26 Mar 2018
黃碩雄 對 范荏愷
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 168
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV130/2017
The appeals were dismissed because the pleaded causes of action lacked legal foundation and were either not recognized (age discrimination), legally inapplicable (incitement absent procuring a breach with loss), factually insufficient to establish harassment (absence of requisite course of conduct causing distress), or legally barred (statements in litigation protected by absolute/qualified privilege); privacy claims under the PDPO were improperly brought in the High Court and personal data used in litigation are exempt under s60B PDPO; new allegations raised on appeal could not be considered…