16 Oct 2012
NKYL v. LSP
- Citation
- NKYL v. LSP
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC8026/2007
The variation application failed because there was no material change of circumstances or unforeseen event to justify narrowing the broad undertaking in the Consent Order; the wording of Recital D covered all tertiary educational expenses including boarding; billing statements and related documentary evidence suffice as proof of payment; children's consent is not a precondition to Petitioner's right of reimbursement; the proposed reductions were arbitrary and contrary to the parties' original agreement; application dismissed and costs awarded to Petitioner.