27 May 2020
郭卓堅 v. 立法會主席梁君彥 AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 919
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL918/2020
The application for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed on the ground that the Applicant lacks the necessary locus under Order 53 rule 3(7); because the Applicant lacked standing the court did not decide the substantive questions about the scope of Rule 92 or the applicability of the non-intervention principle and dismissed the interim relief as overtaken and for lack of standing.