10 Mar 2003
HKSAR v. JOY EXPRESS LTD
- Citation
- HKSAR v. JOY EXPRESS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA5/2003
Given the size, dead weight, wind load, manner of fixation and the potential to overstress and cause imminent danger to the parent building, the metal advertising structures amounted to additions constituting 'building works' under s.2 of the Buildings Ordinance; consequently the appellant's conviction for failing to comply with a s.24(1) order under s.40(1B)(b) was valid and the appeal is dismissed.