25 Jan 2011
厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- 厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV89/2010
Leave to appeal was refused because the questions did not raise matters of great general or public importance, were fact-sensitive to the specific case and were largely hypothetical or muddled, therefore leave under s22(1)(b) was not justified.