2 Apr 2009
HKSAR v. TAN MEIYUAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- HKSAR v. TAN MEIYUAN AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC360/2008
The judge's method of applying a 50% enhancement to an undifferentiated global total was inappropriate because the total sentence must be capable of being derived from individual sentences with clear specification of concurrency and consecutiveness; the Court substituted three years' imprisonment for each offence (reflecting the three-year starting point and enhancement after discount) and specified consecutive portions to achieve totals of 4 years 6 months for D1 and D2 and 45 months for D3; leave to appeal was granted (D3 out of time).