30 Mar 2010
FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY (ASIA) LTD v. LAM HAU WAH INNEO
- Citation
- FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY (ASIA) LTD v. LAM HAU WAH INNEO
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1840/2009
Leave to adduce further evidence was refused because the proposed evidence could have been obtained earlier with reasonable diligence and the defendant did not show the evidence would probably have had an important influence on the outcome; furthermore the defendant's factual case that the payments were non‑repayable compensation was unbelievable in light of signed loan agreements, letters acknowledging indebtedness and commercial common sense, so the summary judgment was correctly upheld.