1 Dec 2009
CHARMAX TRADING LTD v. WT SEA AIR ASIA LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHARMAX TRADING LTD v. WT SEA AIR ASIA LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL8/2009
Because the four bills of lading stipulated delivery to HSBC or its order and none had been endorsed by HSBC, Marchpole and Homebody were not entitled to delivery; WT therefore had no authority to release the sea-carried goods to them and was liable to Charmax for the outstanding purchase price; WT admitted liability for the air-carried goods.